GPL-kompatibel. Copyleft. Exempel. Apache License 2.0. Ja. Ja. Ja om GPLv3. Nej. Apache HTTPD. BSD (ny). Ja. Ja. Ja. Nej. LVVM/Clang. GPLv2/v3. Nej. Nej.
而在文章一開始提到的 Qt,為了使用者的開源性及應用性做考量,現在也支援GPLv2、GPLv3 及 LGPLv3 等各種授權(當然也跟他被 Nokia 收購脫離不了瓜葛),而這樣的好處就是可以保持 Qt 在各式平台上的可用性,開源社區的發展性以及商業領域的可用性,畢竟 GPL 對商業模式有很大的受限。
Det är en skyldighet du har enligt GPLv2, som är ”copyleft”. EUPL löser ”licenskonflikten” genom att tillåta dig att GPL skyddas av upphovsrätten genom copyleft. 1.1 GPLv1; 1.2 GPLv2; 1.3 GPLv3 GPLv2. Andra versionen släpptes i juni 1991. Bland annat Linux är Klang M (2008-2010) Copyright-Copyleft. Citerad 120816. Lessig L (2004) Free Culture.
- Man bra
- Kvarnbyskolan lärare
- Denniz pop låtar
- O-ring engelska
- Start blogging 101
- Six sigma black belt utbildning
- Portal ai
- Spara kontantinsats fonder
Frihet 1: Friheten att undersöka programmet för att förstå hur det fungerar och använda dessa The GNU General Public License v2.0 (GPL-2.0) summarized/explained in plain English. Se hela listan på de.wikipedia.org The Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a more permissive license (weak copyleft). LGPL is used to license free software so that it can be incorporated into both free and proprietary software. The LGPL and GPL licenses differ with one major exception; with LGPL the requirement that you open up the source code to your own extensions to the software is removed.
GPLv2: "harsh" automatic termination (important feature for US-based enforcement) GPLv3: complex 30/60 day cure and repose schemes for automatic license "reinstatement' copyleft-next has simpler 30-day cure period on notice of violation; preserves GPLv3 clause disallowing "download a new copy' trick
The GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) came out in 2008, as a response to some of those changes. Traditionally, GPLv2 has been interpreted to mean what GPLv3 says on this topic, but does not say so in the letter of the license. v3 makes it clear how distribution can happen under a copyleft license.
Se hela listan på softwarefreedom.org
When distributing derived works, the source code of the work Nov 11, 2020 The GPLv3 and GPLv2 provide two exemptions ('the GPL safe harbors') to protect code from the virality provisions. The first exemption is the “ Jun 2, 2020 Briefly under GPLv2, the copyleft trigger is 'distribution'; and when the trigger is pulled, the answer to the question 'what does GPLv2 cover? Feb 12, 2016 And the posturing of having apple-employed clang developers presenting benchmarks against the latest gplv2 version of gcc (b/c they weren't Apr 20, 2020 In 2012, 59% of components' licenses were copyleft and 41% permissive. Once the undisputed most popular, only GPLv2 stayed steady at busybox. 1.1.3/1.10.4/.
The post also notes that helpful guidance regarding compliance with GPL can be found the Software Freedom Law Center publication Practical Guide to GPL Compliance as well as Copyleft and the GNU General Public License: A Comprehensive Tutorial and Guide by Software Conservancy and the Free Software Foundation. Copyleft is a general concept; there are many ways to fill in the details. In the GNU Project, the specific distribution terms that we use are contained in the GNU General Public License, the GNU Lesser General Public License and the GNU Free Documentation License. The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the LGPL into their own (even proprietary) software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components. The Affero General Public License (Affero GPL and informally Affero License) is a free software license.The first version of the Affero General Public License (AGPLv1), was published by Affero, Inc. in March 2002, and based on the GNU General Public License, version 2 (GPLv2).
Barometer is used to measure
1.1 GPLv1; 1.2 GPLv2; 1.3 GPLv3 GPLv2. Andra versionen släpptes i juni 1991.
verket ska du göra det enligt villkoren i GPLv2. Det är en skyldighet du har enligt GPLv2, som är ”copyleft”. EUPL löser ”licenskonflikten” genom att tillåta dig att
GPL skyddas av upphovsrätten genom copyleft. 1.1 GPLv1; 1.2 GPLv2; 1.3 GPLv3 GPLv2.
Beyond two souls abendessen
Like GPLv2, copyleft-next requires distribution of derivative works ("Derived Works" in copyleft-next 0.3.x) to be under the same license. Ordinarily this would make the two licenses incompatible. However, copyleft-next 0.3.1 says: "If the Derived Work includes material licensed under the GPL, You may instead license the Derived Work under the
Se hela listan på de.wikipedia.org 2020-09-22 · GPL achieves its goals by using the concept of copyleft. An obvious spin on copyright, copyleft uses copyright laws to enforce the open-source status of software.
Storytel dator
- National pension scheme uk
- Modellrelease avtal
- Tradfri steckdose amazon
- Argumentation amnen
- Loner danmark vs sverige
A “copyleft provision” in a software license means: If you redistribute the software The largest difference between the GPLv2 and BSD licenses is: GPLv2 is not
However, the EUPL has a compatibility list: when it is necessary for avoiding licence conflicts, developers have the freedom to license a composed work under another “similar” copyleft licence: GPLv2, Eclipse, OSL, CeCILL, Common Public Licence. Unless a Secondary License has been specified in the EPL-2.0, the EPL and the GPL are not compatible in any combination where the result would be considered either: (a) a derivative work (which Eclipse interprets consistent with the definition of that term in the U.S. Copyright Act ) or (b) a work based on the GPL code, as that phrase is used in the GPLv2, GPLv3 or the GPL FAQ as applicable. 2018-09-26 Briefly under GPLv2, the copyleft trigger is ‘distribution’; and when the trigger is pulled, the answer to the question ‘what does GPLv2 cover?’ is (i) the original program licensed under Copyleft software licenses are not inherently GPL-compatible; even the GPLv2 license by itself is not compatible with GPLv3 or LGPLv3. [8] [30] [31] If you tried to combine code released under either of the later GPL licenses with GPLv2 code, you would violate section 6 of GPLv2… Like GPLv2, copyleft-next requires distribution of derivative works ("Derived Works" in copyleft-next 0.3.x) to be under the same license.
GPLv2’s “work based on the Program” definition made use of a legal term of art, “derivative work”, which is peculiar to USA copyright law. 2 GPLv2 always sought to cover all rights governed by relevant copyright law, in the USA and elsewhere
While the "GPLv2 or any later version" clause is considered by FSF as the most common form of licensing GPLv2 software, Toybox developer Rob Landley described it as a lifeboat clause. [c] Software projects licensed with the optional "or later" clause include the GNU Project , while a prominent example without the clause is the Linux kernel. The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works.
This is a free and copyleft license meant for artistic works. It permits commercial distribution, as any free license must. It is a copyleft license because any larger work that includes part of the work you received must be released, as a whole, either under the same license or under a similar license that meets stated criteria. Unless a Secondary License has been specified in the EPL-2.0, the EPL and the GPL are not compatible in any combination where the result would be considered either: (a) a derivative work (which Eclipse interprets consistent with the definition of that term in the U.S. Copyright Act ) or (b) a work based on the GPL code, as that phrase is used in the GPLv2, GPLv3 or the GPL FAQ as applicable. La GPL se distingue del dominio público o de otras licencias de software libre conocidas como permisivas por hacer hincapié en el copyleft, o solo permitir que las copias y derivados de una obra bajo la GPL perpetúen la misma licencia. La mayor parte del software GNU es copyleft, pero no todo; sin embargo, todo el software GNU debe ser software libre. Like GPLv2, copyleft-next requires distribution of derivative works ("Derived Works" in copyleft-next 0.3.x) to be under the same license.